Skip to main content

Uber fined $1.1 million by UK and Dutch regulators over 2016 data breach


British and Dutch data protection regulators Tuesday hit the ride-sharing company Uber with a total fine of $1,170,892 (~ 1.1 million) for failing to protect its customers’ personal information during a 2016 cyber attack involving millions of users.

Late last year, Uber unveiled that the company had suffered a massive data breach in October 2016, exposing names, email addresses and phone numbers of 57 million Uber riders and drivers along with driving license numbers of around 600,000 drivers.

Besides this, it was also reported that instead of disclosing the breach at the time, the company paid $100,000 in ransom to the two hackers with access to the stolen data in exchange for keeping the incident secret and deleting the information.


Today Britain’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) fined Uber 385,000 pounds ($491,102), while the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Dutch DPA) levied a 600,000 euro ($679,790) penalty on Uber for failing to protect the personal information of its 3 million British and 174,000 Dutch citizens, respectively.

"In 2016 a data breach occurred at the Uber concern in the form of unauthorized access to personal data of customers and drivers. The Uber concern is fined because it did not report the data breach to the Dutch DPA and the data subjects within 72 hours after the discovery of the breach," the Dutch DPA says.

The ICO also confirmed that the attackers were able to compromise Uber’s cloud-based storage system using stuffing attack—"a process by which compromised username and password pairs are injected into websites until they are matched to an existing account"—a loophole that could have been "avoided."

"Uber US did not follow the normal operation of its bug bounty programme. In this incident Uber US paid outside attackers who were fundamentally different from legitimate bug bounty recipients: instead of merely identifying a vulnerability and disclosing it responsibly, they maliciously exploited the vulnerability and intentionally acquired personal information relating to Uber users," the ICO states.

The UK watchdog also said that none of the affected customers compromised by the incident were notified of the breach. Instead, Uber started monitoring affected riders and drivers accounts for fraud 12 months after the cyber attack, when the incident was made public last year.


At the time, Uber notified regulatory authorities and offered affected drivers free credit monitoring and identity theft protection.The company assured its users that other personal details, such as trip location history, credit card numbers, bank account numbers, Social Security numbers or dates of birth, were not accessed in the attack.

Since the data breach happened before the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) took effect in May 2018, the fine of £385,000 imposed under the UK's old Data Protection Act 1998 is still lesser.

The penalty could have been much larger had it fallen under EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), wherein a company could face a maximum fine of 17 million pounds or 4% of its annual global revenue, whichever is higher, for such a privacy breach.

Last month, the UK's data protection watchdog also imposed a fine of £500,000 on Facebook for allowing political consultancy firm Cambridge Analytica to gather and misuse data of 87 million users improperly.

In September, the ICO also issued the maximum allowed fine of £500,000 on credit reporting agency Equifax for its last year's massive data breach that exposed personal and financial data of hundreds of millions of its customers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Phishing Campaigns Targeting Google and Yahoo Accounts To Bypassing Two-Factor Authentication Several phishing campaigns targeting hundreds of individuals across the Middle East and North Africa. The attacker targers HRDs, journalists, political actors. Amnesty International published a report on multiple campaigns that traget self-described “secure email” services, such as Tutanota and ProtonMail and another campaign that aimed in bypassing two-factor authentication. Crafted Phishing Sites – Secure Email Providers The phishing campaign primarily targeted popular secure email service providers such as Tutanota and ProtonMail. Threat actors used a well-crafted phishing page – by obtaining the domain tutanota[.]org, whereas the original domain of the service provider is tutanota[.]com. A phishing attack is one of the dangerous social engineering attacks that leads to capture a victim’s username and password that will get store it to an attacker machine and reuse it l...

software development services in noida

Red Securium Company Provide Software Development  Service In Noida Combining technological competency with domain expertise, Red Securium offers full spectrum of custom software design, development and deployment services for enterprises and SMEs to achieve exceptional business results.            Leveraging on its cross-functional width of expertise in application software development , Red Securium has developed the capabilities to build and run resilient applications at scale that seamlessly infuse your innovative ideas. Whether you are in need of the rapid development of a crucial business application or require the deployment and support for an entire suite of applications, we offer full software lifecycle coverage services. We adopt best practices and put highest levels of expertise to drive your technological assets deliver you business excellence and improved ROI. Custom Software Development Services in Noida Enterpri...

Tr0ll 1.0 – Vulnhub CTF Challenge Walkthrough

  Tr0ll 1.0 is an intentionally vulnerable machine, which is more of a   CTF  like type than real world scenario. Nevertheless, this machine has its own difficulties and you can learn some new stuff from it. So, let’s start. Enumeration Phase Let’s first run  netdiscover  to find the IP of our machine. netdiscover -r 192.168.1.1/24 After that, we run our typical  nmap  scan to see the open ports in the machine. nmap -A -sS -Pn -vv [target] Great we see many interesting stuff here. First of all, there is an open  FTP  port and we can connect to it with  anonymous access .  Also there is an open  http  port, we will run a nikto scan for it. The  ssh  port will be valuable later. From the nikto scan we got an interesting  /secret/  folder. When we get inside, we can understand why the machine got this name. Nothing interesting here, as you can see. we got trolled Let’s connect ...